something seem strange with results of the queen odd matches

1 Stockfish 14 +300 =1 -299 *0 300.5 600 50.1%
2 CT800 1.43 +50 =0 -50 *0 50.0 100 50.0%
3 Foxsee 7.20.1 +50 =0 -50 *0 50.0 100 50.0%
4 Loki 3.5.0 +50 =0 -50 *0 50.0 100 50.0%
5 Marvin 2.0 +50 =0 -50 *0 50.0 100 50.0%
6 Nalwald 1.8.1 +50 =0 -50 *0 50.0 100 50.0%
7 Monolith 0.3 +49 =1 -50 *0 49.5 100 49.5%

Having exactly 50 wins and 50 losses for every engine except one with queen odds with only one draw is not logical.

Uri Blass wrote:

1 Stockfish 14  +300   =1 -299   *0  300.5   600   50.1%
 2 CT800 1.43     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 3 Foxsee 7.20.1  +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 4 Loki 3.5.0     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 5 Marvin 2.0     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 6 Nalwald 1.8.1  +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 7 Monolith 0.3   +49   =1  -50   *0   49.5   100   49.5%

Having exactly 50 wins and 50 losses for every engine except one with queen odds with only one draw is not logical.

Does this indicate that the engine with the queen advantage always wins?

TheSelfImprover wrote:

Uri Blass wrote:

1 Stockfish 14  +300   =1 -299   *0  300.5   600   50.1%
 2 CT800 1.43     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 3 Foxsee 7.20.1  +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 4 Loki 3.5.0     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 5 Marvin 2.0     +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 6 Nalwald 1.8.1  +50   =0  -50   *0   50.0   100   50.0%
 7 Monolith 0.3   +49   =1  -50   *0   49.5   100   49.5%

Having exactly 50 wins and 50 losses for every engine except one with queen odds with only one draw is not logical.

Does this indicate that the engine with the queen advantage always wins?

Yes but there was a mistake when Stockfish and Komodo swap sides and now Ed corrected it and we will see correct results for the 2500 engines.

Another interesting outcome is: Stockfish handles better Rook odds than Bishop odds!