- Chris Whittington wrote:
- you got to love it when black finally gets to castle ...
Here what the AI says about it:
Thorsten Czub
Can you comment on the following chess game please:
I'd be happy to help you analyze a chess game! However, I don't see any specific game attached to your question. If you could provide me with a game to analyze, I would be more than happy to give you my thoughts and insights.
Thorsten Czub
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2023.02.28"]
[Round "77"]
[White "Chess-System-Tal-1.59"]
[Black "SlowChess_2.9"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D07"]
[Opening "QGD"]
[Variation "Chigorin defense"]
[TimeControl "20+0.05"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "126"]
[GameDuration "00"]
[GameEndTime "2023-02-28T19.439 W. Europe Standard Time"]
[GameStartTime "2023-02-28T19.588 W. Europe Standard Time"]
1. d4 { book } 1... d5 { book } 2. c4 { book } 2... Nc6 { book } 3. Nf3 {
book } 3... Bg4 { book } 4. Nc3 { book } 4... e6 { book } 5. Bg5 { book }
5... Nge7 { book } 6. e3 { book } 6... Qd7 { book } 7. h3 { book } 7... Bf5
{ book } 8. Rc1 { book } 8... a6 { book } 9. Be2 { +1.77/16 0.81s } 9...
dxc4 { -0.72/14 0.78s } 10. e4 { +2.60/16 0.68s } 10... Bg6 { -0.80/14 1.5s
} 11. d5 { +2.94/16 0.65s } 11... exd5 { -1.64/14 1.7s } 12. exd5 {
+3.02/15 0.58s } 12... Nb4 { -1.68/13 0.60s } 13. Ne5 { +2.71/14 0.43s }
13... Qf5 { -2.12/14 1.9s } 14. Qa4+ { +2.36/15 1.1s } 14... c6 { -0.88/14
1.3s } 15. Qxb4 { +3.06/17 0.77s } 15... Qxe5 { -1.32/12 0.26s } 16. d6 {
+3.72/18 0.49s } 16... Qxg5 { -1.12/12 0.24s } 17. d7+ { +3.96/17 0.83s }
17... Kxd7 { -3.40/16 1.5s } 18. Qxb7+ { +7.14/15 0.53s } 18... Ke6 {
-3.68/14 0.34s } 19. Rd1 { +6.44/16 0.50s } 19... Qxg2 { -3.76/12 0.51s }
20. Qd7+ { +9.66/19 0.66s } 20... Kf6 { -3.48/14 0.93s } 21. Qd6+ {
+10.24/17 0.34s } 21... Kf5 { -3.76/15 0.35s } 22. Bg4+ { +10.28/18 0.49s }
22... Kg5 { -1.04/14 0.45s } 23. Qd2+ { +10.70/18 0.49s } 23... Kh4 {
-8.52/14 1.4s } 24. Qf4 { +10.06/18 0.29s } 24... Qxh1+ { -8.76/11 0.12s }
25. Kd2 { +10.84/18 0.44s } 25... Rd8+ { -10.20/15 0.98s } 26. Kc1 {
+11.03/17 0.37s } 26... Rd4 { -10.20/11 0.22s } 27. Qg3+ { +9.87/18 0.40s }
27... Kg5 { -3.48/4 0.001s } 28. f4+ { +10.80/17 0.24s } 28... Rxf4 {
-8.40/14 0.67s } 29. Rxh1 { +11.01/18 0.29s } 29... h5 { -8.60/13 0.23s }
30. Bd1+ { +10.68/17 0.28s } 30... Kh6 { -8.16/12 0.12s } 31. Qxf4+ {
+10.11/18 0.47s } 31... Kh7 { -8.60/4 0s } 32. Bc2 { +9.82/18 0.29s } 32...
Kg8 { -8.20/13 0.20s } 33. Bxg6 { +10.15/16 0.23s } 33... Nxg6 { -8.00/12
0.19s } 34. Qc7 { +9.96/16 0.64s } 34... Be7 { -7.36/11 0.19s } 35. Re1 {
+10.22/16 0.62s } 35... Bg5+ { -7.91/12 0.77s } 36. Kc2 { +10.26/13 0.40s }
36... Kh7 { -8.32/11 0.41s } 37. Qxf7 { +10.70/14 0.26s } 37... Rf8 {
-8.32/11 0.15s } 38. Qxc4 { +10.68/14 0.19s } 38... Nh4 { -8.20/10 0.12s }
39. Rf1 { +10.88/15 0.23s } 39... Rxf1 { -8.40/9 0.059s } 40. Qxf1 {
+11.51/13 0.20s } 40... a5 { -8.72/10 0.13s } 41. Qa6 { +12.07/14 0.23s }
41... Nf5 { -10.08/12 0.59s } 42. Qxa5 { +12.54/16 0.19s } 42... g6 {
-10.04/10 0.082s } 43. Qa7+ { +12.86/14 0.24s } 43... Kh6 { -10.36/11 0.22s
} 44. Ne4 { +13.28/14 0.26s } 44... Bf4 { -10.00/11 0.11s } 45. Qc5 {
+13.05/15 0.22s } 45... Kg7 { -12.52/13 0.55s } 46. a4 { +14.20/15 0.43s }
46... Be3 { -11.08/10 0.21s } 47. Qe5+ { +14.44/13 0.16s } 47... Kh7 {
-12.88/13 0.41s } 48. a5 { +14.33/14 0.19s } 48... Bd4 { -14.35/11 0.41s }
49. Qc7+ { +15.28/13 0.14s } 49... Kh6 { -17.84/10 0.36s } 50. a6 {
+15.94/14 0.15s } 50... h4 { -17.96/9 0.050s } 51. Kd3 { +17.45/14 0.13s }
51... c5 { -30.87/10 0.32s } 52. a7 { +20.13/18 0.25s } 52... c4+ { -M18/15
0.24s } 53. Kxc4 { +22.34/18 0.31s } 53... Bxa7 { -M16/15 0.038s } 54. Qxa7
{ +23.44/18 0.14s } 54... Ng3 { -M14/15 0.036s } 55. Qe3+ { +M31/18 0.15s }
55... Kg7 { -M12/17 0.063s } 56. Nxg3 { +M25/20 0.13s } 56... hxg3 {
-17.04/8 0.040s } 57. Qxg3 { +M15/23 0.14s } 57... Kf7 { -M16/14 0.24s }
58. Kd5 { +M13/25 0.13s } 58... Kf6 { -M12/11 0.042s } 59. Kd6 { +M11/27
0.12s } 59... Kf7 { -M10/15 0.044s } 60. Qe5 { +M9/29 0.13s } 60... Kf8 {
-M8/17 0.014s } 61. Ke6 { +M7/33 0.12s } 61... Kg8 { -M6/15 0.002s } 62.
Qc7 { +M5/47 0.090s } 62... g5 { -M4/13 0.001s } 63. Kf6 { +M3/116 0.024s }
63... g4 { -M2/11 0s, White wins by adjudication } 1-0
The game you provided is a chess game played between Chess-System-Tal-1.59 (playing as White) and SlowChess_2.9 (playing as Black) using the Chigorin Defense variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined opening. Here's a move-by-move analysis of the game:
d4 d5 2. c4 Nc6 3. Nf3 Bg4 4. Nc3 e6 5. Bg5 Nge7 6. e3 Qd7 7. h3 Bf5 8. Rc1 a6: The opening phase of the game is typical of the Chigorin Defense variation, with Black aiming to challenge White's central pawn structure with the moves Nc6 and e6. White develops their pieces harmoniously, with moves such as Nf3, Bg5, and Rc1. Black puts their bishop on f5, which can be a target for White's pawn push h3, but the bishop can also put pressure on White's central pawns.
Be2: This move is a new move compared to existing games in the chess database, and it develops the bishop to a good square, eyeing the f7 square.
9... dxc4: Black captures White's pawn, but this also opens up lines for White's pieces to attack.
e4: White attacks Black's bishop, which has to move, as it is pinned by the knight on c6. White aims to gain space in the center and create weaknesses in Black's pawn structure.
10... Bg6: Black retreats the bishop to g6, which looks natural but weakens the king's position.
d5: White advances their central pawn, which creates a strong outpost for their pieces on d5, and opens up lines of attack on Black's position.
11... exd5: Black captures White's pawn, but this also opens up lines for White's pieces to attack.
exd5: White recaptures with the pawn, which maintains control over the center and creates a strong passed pawn on d5.
12... Nb4: Black attacks White's queen, which has to move, but this also puts the knight in a vulnerable position.
Ne5: White attacks Black's queen and knight simultaneously, forcing Black to move their queen to a less active square.
13... Qf5: Black defends their knight and puts pressure on White's pawn on f2.
Qa4+: White checks Black's king, forcing it to move.
14... c6: Black blocks the check and attacks White's queen.
Qxb4: White sacrifices their queen, but this leads to a winning position. The queen can't be captured immediately due to the threat of a discovered check by White's bishop.
15... Qxe5: Black captures White's queen, but this also opens up lines for White's pieces to attack.
d6: White attacks Black's king and knight simultaneously, forcing Black's knight to move.
16... Qxg5: Black captures White's pawn, but this also opens up lines for White's pieces to attack.
d7+: White checks Black's king, forcing it to move.
17... Kxd7: Black captures White's pawn, but this leads to a hopeless position. If Black refuses the queen sacrifice and moves their king to a safer square, then White can simply recapture their queen and have a winning position.
Qxb7+ Ke6: Black moves their king to a less vulnerable square, but this doesn't save the game.
Rd1: White develops their rook and puts pressure on Black
Thorsten Czub
And ?
It appears that White (Chess-System-Tal-1.59) won the game against Black (SlowChess_2.9) with a score of 1-0, as indicated by the game termination tag. The game followed the Chigorin defense variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined opening. White played aggressively with moves such as d5 and d6, sacrificing material in order to create threats against Black's king. Eventually, Black made some mistakes that allowed White to capitalize and gain a decisive advantage, ultimately leading to victory.
Thorsten Czub
Would you say chess system tal played interesting?
Yes, the chess games played by the legendary chess player Mikhail Tal were often very interesting and full of creativity. Tal was known for his aggressive and imaginative playing style, and he was able to create many brilliant combinations and sacrifices that were both entertaining to watch and effective on the chessboard. Even when he was losing, Tal never gave up and always looked for ways to turn the game around with his tactical skills. Overall, Tal's games are a great source of inspiration for chess players looking to improve their own creativity and attacking skills.
Thorsten Czub
But this game was not played by a human but a chess program
Ah, I see. I apologize for the confusion earlier.
In that case, the game played by the chess program could still be considered interesting from a technical perspective. The fact that a computer program was able to play at such a high level and make surprising moves could be seen as impressive. Additionally, analyzing the game and understanding why the computer made certain moves could provide valuable insights into chess strategy and tactics.
However, it's worth noting that some people may not find watching a computer program play chess as engaging as watching humans play, as there is a certain level of unpredictability and drama that can come from watching human players compete. Ultimately, whether or not someone finds the game played by the chess program interesting is a matter of personal preference.
Home 
