ProDeo
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
ProDeo

Computer Chess
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  Latest imagesLatest images  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log in  

 

 Stockfish 13 Playing Strength Comparison with Grandmasters at 100 milliseconds a move.

Go down 
AuthorMessage
mwyoung

mwyoung


Posts : 880
Join date : 2020-11-25
Location : USA

Stockfish 13 Playing Strength Comparison with Grandmasters at 100 milliseconds a move.  Empty
PostSubject: Stockfish 13 Playing Strength Comparison with Grandmasters at 100 milliseconds a move.    Stockfish 13 Playing Strength Comparison with Grandmasters at 100 milliseconds a move.  EmptyMon Mar 29, 2021 4:41 am

The data suggest that Stockfish 13 on one core has a much greater playing strength at 100 milliseconds a move. Then the best Grandmaster's playing chess at classical time controls.

Centipawn analysis engine Stockfish 190321 on 16 cores.

All human games are a comparison at classical fide time controls. Verses Stockfish at 100 milliseconds per move.

1. Stockfish 13 playing at 100ms a move on 1 core. Average of 50 games 0.12 CentiPawn loss per move.

2. Carlsen Magnus, Fide rating of games 2862:   6/28/22/33/22/33/9/17/9/33/24/11/33/4/4/4/3/21/8/3/11/1  => Average=0.16 CentiPawn loss per move.

3. Nakamura Hikaru, Fide rating of games 2776   35/36/4/42/10/59/16/12/28/11/13/11/28/24/36/8/33/2/7/2  => Average=0.21 CentiPawn loss per move.

4. Ivanchuk Vassily, Fide rating of games 2731   8/72/16/9/12/17/38/10/18/23/42/4/48/13/10/40/12/16/11/4  => Average=0.22 CentiPawn loss per move.

5. Akobian Varuzhan, Fide rating of games 2622  43/33/42/19/27/20/9/45/31/14/16/71/1/40/10/19/14/3/6/0  => Average=0.27 CentiPawn loss per move.

6. Stockfish 11 x64 modern playing at 100ms a move on 1 core. Average of 50 games 0.35 CentiPawn loss per move.

7. Sevian Samuel, Fide rating of games 2531   33/98/47/62/78/37/19/30/21/5/58/1/26/17/15/12/9/46/33/9  => Average=0.36 CentiPawn loss per move.

Raw data.
Code:
Onischuk Alexander:   0  => Average=0.00
So Wesley:   0  => Average=0.00
Mamedov Rauf:   5  => Average=0.05
Troff Kayden W:   5  => Average=0.05
Zhou Jianchao:   6  => Average=0.06
Gareyev Timur:   8/8  => Average=0.08
Kamsky Gata:   9  => Average=0.09
Nakamura Hikaru:   11  => Average=0.11
Robson Ray:   12  => Average=0.12
Ramirez Alvarez Alejandro:   19  => Average=0.19
Sevian Samuel:   20  => Average=0.20
Shankland Samuel L:   22  => Average=0.22
Ghaem Maghami Ehsan:   25  => Average=0.25
Akobian Varuzhan:   43/33/42/19/27/20/9/45/31/14/16/71/1/40/10/19/14/3/6/0  => Average=0.27
Holt Conrad:   33  => Average=0.33
Naroditsky Daniel:   79/24  => Average=0.52
Bryant John Daniel:   65  => Average=0.65
Tang Andrew:   77  => Average=0.77
Kretchetov Alexandre:   86  => Average=0.86

Ivanchuk Vassily:   1  => Average=0.01
Anand Viswanathan:   4  => Average=0.04
Giri Anish:   10/3  => Average=0.06
Ding Liren:   7  => Average=0.07
Wojtaszek Radoslaw:   12  => Average=0.12
Topalov Veselin:   14  => Average=0.14
Nakamura Hikaru:   15  => Average=0.15
Carlsen Magnus:   6/28/22/33/22/33/9/17/9/33/24/11/33/4/4/4/3/21/8/3/11/1  => Average=0.16
Saric Ivan:   16  => Average=0.16
Vachier Lagrave Maxime:   31/1  => Average=0.17
Grischuk Alexander:   19  => Average=0.19
Radjabov Teimour:   33  => Average=0.33
Aronian Levon:   48/11  => Average=0.37
So Wesley:   55/6  => Average=0.37
Hou Yifan:   41  => Average=0.41
Caruana Fabiano:   41/57  => Average=0.48
Jobava Baadur:   61  => Average=0.61
Van Wely Loek:   66  => Average=0.66

Stockfish 13:   21/5/25/37/8/31/18/12/3/13/7/9/23/19/28/9/3/10/21/3/9/12/8/37/5/12/8/7/16/2/13/7/4/7/3/14/6/6/6/9/10/5/5/15/7/6/4/7/14/21  => Average=0.12
Stockfish 11 x64 modern:   29/32/37/26/64/5/33/34/3/48/43/38/87/6/47/9/27/67/92/112/26/35/6/88/2/12/27/58/15/3/21/23/40/7/50/30/25/29/25/53/36/77/6/13/33/8/33/47/48/33  => Average=0.35

Fridman Daniel:   4  => Average=0.04
Shankland Samuel L:   5  => Average=0.05
Malakhov Vladimir:   9  => Average=0.09
Wang Hao:   9  => Average=0.09
Dobrov Vladimir:   10  => Average=0.10
Gelfand Boris:   10  => Average=0.10
Hambleton Aman:   11  => Average=0.11
Ganguly Surya Shekhar:   13  => Average=0.13
Ivanchuk Vassily:   8/72/16/9/12/17/38/10/18/23/42/4/48/13/10/40/12/16/11/4  => Average=0.22
Harikrishna Pentala:   23  => Average=0.23
Matras Clement Agnieszka:   36  => Average=0.36
Rapport Richard:   45  => Average=0.45
Pechenkin Vladimir:   50  => Average=0.50
Haessel Dale R:   51  => Average=0.51
Karjakin Sergey:   51  => Average=0.51
Miezis Normunds:   53  => Average=0.53
Gardner Robert:   61  => Average=0.61
Shomoev Anton:   62  => Average=0.62
Fedoseev Vladimir:   65  => Average=0.65
Troyke Christian:   75  => Average=0.75
Mamedyarov Shakhriyar:   132  => Average=1.32

Harikrishna Pentala:   1  => Average=0.01
Aronian Levon:   7  => Average=0.07
Kramnik Vladimir:   9  => Average=0.09
Bachmann Axel:   10  => Average=0.10
So Wesley:   11  => Average=0.11
Nakamura Hikaru:   35/36/4/42/10/59/16/12/28/11/13/11/28/24/36/8/33/2/7/2  => Average=0.21
Nabaty Tamir:   27  => Average=0.27
Topalov Veselin:   33  => Average=0.33
Anand Viswanathan:   10/68  => Average=0.34
Grandelius Nils:   34  => Average=0.34
Caruana Fabiano:   43  => Average=0.43
Kamsky Gata:   44  => Average=0.44
Karjakin Sergey:   45  => Average=0.45
Yu Yangyi:   47  => Average=0.47
Howell David:   48  => Average=0.48
Adhiban Baskaran:   50  => Average=0.50
Akobian Varuzhan:   53  => Average=0.53
Holt Conrad:   63  => Average=0.63
Harika Dronavalli:   65  => Average=0.65
Rapport Jovana:   87  => Average=0.87

Naroditsky Daniel:   0  => Average=0.00
Margvelashvili Giorgi:   12/0  => Average=0.10
Akobian Varuzhan:   13  => Average=0.13
Gareyev Timur:   13  => Average=0.13
Robson Ray:   14  => Average=0.14
Shankland Samuel L:   15  => Average=0.15
Onischuk Alexander:   20  => Average=0.20
Nakamura Hikaru:   21  => Average=0.21
Kamsky Gata:   22  => Average=0.22
Holt Conrad:   12/46  => Average=0.28
Kritz Leonid:   6/71  => Average=0.33
Sevian Samuel:   33/98/47/62/78/37/19/30/21/5/58/1/26/17/15/12/9/46/33/9  => Average=0.36
Troff Kayden W:   39  => Average=0.39
Kadric Denis:   53/44  => Average=0.49
Iotov Valentin Dimitrov:   96/31  => Average=0.67
So Wesley:   71  => Average=0.71
 
Back to top Go down
 
Stockfish 13 Playing Strength Comparison with Grandmasters at 100 milliseconds a move.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Stockfish demonstrates insane level of playing strength.
» Benjamin 1.1 - Improved Playing Style and Strength.
» trying to beat stockfish 5M nodes per move with no book
» Testing the New Stockfish Net of 45 Mb, Stockfish 190521 vs Stockfish 13 (TC = 5m+5s) (32 Threads)
» CCRL vs GRL - a comparison

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
ProDeo :: Computer Chess-
Jump to: